ABSTRACT

With its often vague legal concepts and institutions that operate according to unfamiliar procedures, judicial decision-making is, in many respects, a highly enigmatic process. New Directions in Judicial Politics seeks to demystify the courts, offering readers the insights of empirical research to address questions that are of genuine interest to students.

In addition to presenting a set of conclusions about the way in which courts operate, this book also models the craft of political research, illustrating how one can account for a variety of factors that might affect the courts and how they operate. The renowned scholars and teachers in this volume invite critical thinking, not only about the substance of law and courts in America, but also about the ways in which we study judicial politics.

part 1|52 pages

Selecting Judges

part 2|53 pages

Trial Courts

chapter 4|25 pages

Race and Death Sentencing 1

chapter 5|26 pages

Under-Estimating and Over-Estimating Litigation

How Activist Plaintiffs may Advance their Causes Even as they Lose their Cases

part 4|51 pages

Courts and Their Political Environments

chapter 11|14 pages

Goldilocks and the Supreme Court

Understanding the Relationship between the Supreme Court, the President, and the Congress

part 5|43 pages

Implementation and Impact

chapter 15|23 pages

Why Strict Scrutiny Requires Transparency

The Practical Effects of Bakke, Gratz, and Grutter 1